

Mention the word Kenwood in the U.S., and people automatically think of high-end audio stuff. Mention the word Kenwood in the U.K., however, and this is what us limeys think of: the Kenwood Chef. (By the way, lady in the picture, I think you should get yourself over to E.R. straight away, it looks like you've got a nasty case of S.T.S.T.Y.C.*) Now then, before DVICE's more irascible readers get to work in the comments moaning that there are T.M.A.I.T.P.**, and, "Where's the product shot, dumbass?" (here's a clue: hit the Continue Reading link and you'll find a mini gallery for your delectation) I wish to tell you exactly how much I like this picture. And then we'll talk about what I'm meant to be talking about, namely the Kenwood Cooking Chef, the first ever food processor that cooks as it stirs. Now, click continue — you know you want to.
I like the first image in this post because it shows us just how far we've come. Perhaps this was the photo that made Thrillary Clinton decide that she wasn't going to stay at home and bake cookies for her man — let's face it, if you're married to a man like Bill Clinton, the phrase "The way to a man's heart is through his stomach" just doesn't cut any ice, does it? You just know that the signpost directing travellers to Bill Clinton's heart is aimed due south of his ex-presidential belly.
Yeah, yeah, I know you're just gagging to hear about the hot and mixy Kenwood Cooking Chef, but can we talk about the strapline on the ad? I so like the strapline. "I'm giving my wife a Kenwood Chef." It just begs the reply, "Oh really honey? And I'm giving you divorce papers/tantric sex lessons/chlamydia." Since when did advertisements stop being so entertaining? Hindsight truly is a beautiful thing — as is irony (another domestic chore that I'm not very good at, but hey, rumpled sexiness is big where I come from.)
But I digress. You want to hear about the Kenwood Cooking Chef, doncha? Like I said before my monologue got in the way, it's the first ever food mixer that cooks while it mixes. Evah. This means choux pastry, risotto, meringue are all easy peasy. Well, I reckon risotto's easy peasy anyway, and all that sticky stirring gives you great upper-arm strength — perfect for slapping that sexist pig damn hard when he won't get back in the kitchen and make me a sandwich (not that DVICE endorses violence, oh no, peeps, a lover not a fighter am I.)
Now then, price time. The Kenwood Cooking Chef (see how many times I've repeated their name, ooh, I should be doing infomercials, I should) costs 995 of our British pounds, which is a smidgeon over $1,600. Yeah, expensive. The original Kenwood Chef*** — see below, alongside its grandson — came out in 1950 and cost £19.50 — or its pounds, shillings and pence equivalent. Which begs one question. If, 59 years ago, the Kenwood Chef cost Nineteen Pounds and Fifty Pence, surely, in 2009, the Kenwood Chef should cost Twenty Pounds and Nine Pence.
Economics was never my strong point.
*Sexist Twat Stuck To Your Cheek, a highly disfiguring disease.
**Too Many Acronyms In This Post.
***Useless fact fans may like to know that it was invented by a man called Ken Wood.
Via Daily Mail
![]() | ![]() |
|
|
By celix7 at 9:25 AM ON 10/15/09
What the hell does a vintage kitchen mixer have to do with SyFy? Did anyone READ this before they posted it here? It's awful. It's SPIKE - 5 years ago.
By Critic at 9:36 AM ON 10/15/09
Worst post ever.
By ideceased at 10:01 AM ON 10/15/09
to celix7's comment, you need to R.E.A.D your self you illiterate, DVICE is about TECHNOLOGY not syfy, dvice is powered by syfy, this post was probably ment to show how far kenwood has come with cooking ware?
By Anonymous at 11:06 AM ON 10/15/09
@ideaceased - thanks for enlightening me. The two sentences that reference Kenwood's technological advancement are super informative. And I found the paragraph about the Clintons delightfully witty commentary. I second Critic's sentiment - WORST POST EVER.
By Parsley at 12:19 PM ON 10/15/09
Fellow Brit jumping to Addy's defence; it's a good product and if it frees up more time for her to do laundry, cleaning and lingerie shopping then so much the better.
That second bit was a joke. But I still wouldn't pay $1600 for a food processor, cooking facility or not.
By Dvice Reader at 12:42 PM ON 10/15/09
You should've left off the first acronym - it's not something some folks might wanna read.
By Dvice Fan at 6:26 PM ON 10/15/09
I was surprised at the reaction to this post. I'm a big fan of Dvice and thought this post was funny and well written. It was edgier than most other posts on this site, but that's not a bad thing. The post exhibited a new product by contrasting it with a hilarious advertisement for an older generation of the same product. Nothing wrong with that.
@Dvice Reader - the term twat isn't as offensive in the UK as it is in the US. Since the post is about a British product made by a British company I think you have to read the humor from a British point of view.
By bhharrison at 7:08 PM ON 10/15/09
Really? Is this what Dvice has come to? I could've sworn this site was geared toward discussions of technology (sometimes needed, sometimes stupid, but technology nonetheless). Instead we have what seems to be an angry child blogging about someone that insulted them today at school. Do you guys employ ANY journalists?
By Withidread at 10:53 PM ON 10/15/09
Can we leave the soapbox outside and get back to the real technology please?
By Realist at 11:28 AM ON 10/16/09
Author of this 'article' (and i'm being generous calling it that) is a jackass.
By NeonJedi at 11:56 AM ON 10/17/09
This post is offensive, and not because of the trite attempt at neosexist humor. It's badly written stream of consciousness rife with offensive gab. I vote to have it deleted.
NeonJedi:
This post is offensive, and not because of the trite attempt at neosexist humor. It's badly written stream of consc...More »