I wonder what kind of emissions the power source for that sign puts out. o_O

Just another way to scare us into paying more taxes so that the liberals can give it to other liberals to scare us some more.

I wonder how many tons of carbon based fuel is used to light the sign

When are the facts going to come out on CO2? The friction between the air we breath and the oceans generate CO2. Every breathing creature on this planet expels CO2. Green plants rely on CO2 for growth. Al Gore lied to you!

While I do agree it is our job to be the best stewards of our planet as possible, this Carbon Craze is a fallacy. When the founder of the Weather Channel has suspicions that should tell you not to buy this theory hook, line and sinker.

-powering the sign uses energy that's probably not solar (no info posted on it)
-powering those dozens of atmospheric stations around the world uses energy
-creating the sign produced many kinds of waste and pollutants
-the color of the sign probably absorbs so much sunlight that the building it's covering has to run A/C's all day long.

bump at top 3 posters :)

dumb sign.

global warming is a load of crap.

@ tearemup

http://dvice.com/archives/2008/10/carbon_nanotube.php ->(sarcasm started a good convo on here haha)

Useful only if you put another one under there that tracks how many tons we're shooting into the air by BREATHING.

3 Words...... Dumb

More Douche bank than Deutsche bank.

Saving the world, one large worthless sign at a time.

Um... What if the thickest strata of ice, supposedly taking the longest to collect, came from a very warm world in a surprisingly short time? What if the lower carbon dioxide levels in this 'Ice Age' ice are caused by an explosion of greenery in a warmer world? Shouldn't there be anti-suicidal-conclusion-jumping guardrails on the bridge to the twenty-first century?

It can be as "accurate" as they like, its still cr*p.

By my calculations, we're diluting the atmosphere with carbon by 0.00001513728% per year.

I'm terrified. (yawn)

I'm sorry, but where did the national debt tracker go? Oh, the savior of mankind, The One (Teh Noob) is now in office.

WOW, and they say conservatives are the fear mongers! I think this sign describes the budget deficit under obaama! liberalism=socialism

Please read this!

http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/

http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/ice_ages.html

Approximately 99.72% of the "greenhouse effect" is due to natural causes -- mostly water vapor and traces of other gases, which we can do nothing at all about. Eliminating human activity altogether would have little impact on climate change.

Human "Greenhouse gases" in Earth's atmosphere also influence Earth's temperature, but in a much smaller way. Human additions to total greenhouse gases play a still smaller role, contributing about 0.2% - 0.3% to Earth's greenhouse effect.

I'm proud to see other fellow skeptics refusing to swallow the crap science surrounding the man-made global warming myth. Don't ever let foolish hypocrites scare you into their belief system. We would do best to ignore reactionary hype and simply rely on empirical evidence when dealing with critical matters such as this.

cast a green shadow
visit my website get involved..
www.webstarts.com/aliasmadrona

Doomsday Clock..really it is....im sure its not yet too late ...we can still do somthing.....to prolong earths life....Lets overhaul the planet.

I have got to say that although fine the whole global warming issue has been blown out of proportion it is still excatly that... An "issue"! There is no way that the majority of publicised scientists can be wrong about such a controversial issue and yet every obne of you has said someting to the effect of "global warming does now exist" or "its not really a problem" I have to tell you that it is a problem... Wether is is a problem for us.... or our children.... or their children... Or anyone for that matter is it right for us to cause a problem that, as you have all pointed out, we will not be around to face the consequences of?

And please don't just jump down my throat as I am the only one to speak up and a tleast take some time to consider what I have said!

Trying to argue with a CC skeptic is like wrestling a greasy pig. They will not changed their mind no matter what evidence is produce. The major driving factor in their skepticism is that they do not want to change their extravagant carbon indulgent lifestyle. Humanity just has to hope that their children and their children's children take control of the future.