The Syfy Online NetworkSCI FI WireDVICEFidgit

We love technology. We want to know about it, write about it, and shake it till it breaks. Part of the Syfy Network, DVICE has a worldwide team of writers who constantly immerse themselves in the tech world, distilling the sometimes-excessive information out there to bring you only what you need to know.

Video
 

Related Sections: Future Tech  Lists  Robots

The Future of Robotics, Part 2: What we can learn from movie robots

The-future-of-robotics-part-2-Terminator-Salvation.jpgIn the first part of our expert roundtable, we asked AI whiz and CMU assistant professor James Kuffner what it would take to breathe life into C-3PO. Now we turn to Matt Denton, who runs an animatronic company in the U.K. and is no stranger to movie robots.

Sure, those bad boys on the big screen are fiction, but advances in robotics are happening all the time. What could be realized now? And will we see protocol droids (or badass Terminator endoskeletons) walking down the street in our lifetimes? Click Continue to find out.


Robot-Roundtable-Matt-Denton.jpgMatt Denton, founder of Micromagic Systems, supplies robotic and puppet-control equipment to the entertainment industry. His personal creations often take the shape of six-legged, face-tracking 'bots, and he has worked behind the scenes on movies such as the Harry Potter series and the latest Lost in Space.

Denton's iC Hexapod has made numerous appearances on DVICE, and wowed crowds abroad. He's also developed a robotic kit based on his iC design so folks can assemble their own.

DVICE: Is a robot like C-3PO an improbable dream?
Denton: I wouldn't say C-3PO was an improbable dream, but even with the massive advances of technology and the exponential growth of computing power I just don't think I will meet him in my lifetime.

Having said that I remember my father's first mobile phone. It was about the size of a car battery, weighed about the same as a car battery and had a standby time of four hours! Now if you told me that in less than 15 years I would have a phone that was smaller than a cigarette packet, had a video camera built in and would work nearly anywhere in the world, I probably would have said it was improbable. Lets hope I'm also wrong about C-3PO!

What would a 'bot like C-3PO be good for, anyway?
I think there would be countless situations where a C-3PO-like robot would be at least as good if not better than a human. For example, so many people who need care for various reasons such as old age, illness and disabilities could benefit from a robot like C-3PO. However, this then raises an ethical question: Why should or would a robot be any better at this role than a human?

I can't help but think that the robot has the advantage of never giving up, losing patience or growing tired, but could or would it form an emotional bond with the patient? Then again, could it outperform its human counterpart because of those things?

Matt-Denton-iC-hexapod-on-display.jpgMatt Denton's original robot, iC Hexapod

How far along is robotics toward those ends?
At this point I believe robots are still fulfilling their roles as assembly machines. This is something they have been doing for some time now in situations such as car manufacturing and have been doing it well — certainly faster and more efficiently than us mere mortals. Having said that, they didn't work out how to do this for themselves. We built them and then programmed them, so maybe they're not that bright after all.

There are of course many more practical uses for the robots we currently use, but for now I think robots are still very much in their infancy with the majority of robotics still in the research and development stage.

In what ways do you think we come close to C-3PO?
Have we come close to C-3PO? I would say no! Maybe we have in small ways, and for sure the first time I saw Asimo walking up and down stairs and following somebody around a room, I was blown away! But we still have so much further to go. For example, how often did C-3PO need to stop and charge his batteries? Although we have seen huge advances in battery technology over the past decade, a long-lasting power source still seems to be one of the biggest problems with mobile robotics.

Also, just think about what seems like a simple task to say a ten year old: Catching a ball. This seems like a relatively simple task, and of course it would be reasonable to think that a specific machine could be built to track and catch a ball using various sensors and a large catching bucket, but it's vastly complex for a humanoid robot.

Matt-Denton-favorite-robots.jpgJust for fun, what's your favorite 'bot of all time?
This is a tricky one, as I love the design of robots like ED-209 (from RoboCop), Terminator and even the robot I helped build for the 1997 version of Lost In Space (bad film, great robot!). But my all-time favorite robot creations would be the Nexus series from Blade Runner, with Rachael and Pris at the top of my list… Woof! (Technically Deckard was my favorite robot, but there seem to be a bunch of people who still aren't convinced he's a replicant. Come on!)

 
Send-A-Friend
(9) Comments

IsoTek:
@Zero: Ridley Scott supposedly told Harrison Ford that Deckerd was not a replicant during the movies filming, but t...More »


Comments

By yellowflash at 2:41 AM ON 03/12/09

in the book it is made clear he is in fact not an android.

By IsoTek at 7:56 AM ON 03/12/09

Also in the book it is made clear that even though "replicants" were androids, they were biologically based. Essentially a "Bioroid" with custom made organs and genetic sequences. I doubt this modern day roboticist could conjure up anything as complex.

By Zero at 11:12 AM ON 03/12/09

I thought the author revealed that Deckard was a replicant during some anniversary edition/release?

By Kjasr at 2:49 PM ON 03/12/09

The book and movie were clear enough that Deckard is a human. The book makes it point blank he is.

What is it with people thinking he is a replicant lately moreso than years ago?

By Yellowflash at 3:18 PM ON 03/12/09

He uses a machine that works with your empathy in the book. Considering the test used to see if a person is an android (replicant in the movie) works off empathy and exposes the android because they do not express or have empathy proves he is in fact a human.

By parker at 3:50 PM ON 03/12/09

believe it or not, THIS GUY is living the dream...Cyberdyne + HAL? Cyborgs in japan...

http://tinyurl.com/aerl64

What do you think about Dell + Vice being all over it?

By whiteviper1964 at 4:51 PM ON 03/12/09

Blade Runner was based on a book title, "Do Androids dream of eletric Sheep?", which its premise is pretty scary. But really folks, we are on an age of robotics and cloning. Think of it the first animal cloned was a sheep next humans, pretty damn scary stuff.

By DBSII at 6:46 PM ON 03/12/09

My favorite robot from the movies was the one in I Robot. No not the humanoid but the Demolition bot that destroys the house of the dead Dr while Will Smith is still in it well he got out but hey can't have everything my way!

It was a huge inspiration on my Collage project from Sr year. Thanks to Kevin for giving me such kind words on the project!

http://dvice.com/archives/2008/05/stunning_disast.php

Dan

By IsoTek at 10:33 PM ON 03/12/09

@Zero: Ridley Scott supposedly told Harrison Ford that Deckerd was not a replicant during the movies filming, but then changed his tune years later when he released the directors cut of Blade Runner. Most refuse to believe he is a replicant and in terms of the actual evidence, it doesn't really prove conculsively that he is. Deckard is human.


Leave a Comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

(Please be patient, it may take a moment for your comment to appear.)

DVICE continues below
Get the latest tech news
on your cellphone!
Text DVICE to 72434
DVICE on your iPhone
Follow DVICE on Twitter
Editor: Peter Pachal
editor@dvice.com
©2009, Syfy. All rights reserved.