The Syfy Online NetworkSCI FI WireDVICEFidgit

DVICE: We love technology. We want to know about it, write about it, and shake it till it breaks. Part of the Syfy Network, DVICE has a worldwide team of writers who constantly immerse themselves in the tech world, distilling the sometimes-excessive information out there to bring you only what you need to know.

Video
 

Related Sections: Household  Reviews

Omron Full Body Sensor says marathoner has body of a 57-year-old

omron_full_body_sensor_main.jpg

With some time on my hands recently, I finally had the chance to try out a Full Body Sensor that a company called Omron sent me. The product is essentially a tricked-out bathroom scale: Not only does it tell you your weight and the percentage of your body fat, you get a health nut's dream of body statistics, including your BMI (body mass index) as well as the big kicker: your body's "physical" age. Turned out mine was 57. That would be totally fine except I'm 34. And I just ran a marathon. Wha…?

How could a product that promises a "comprehensive understanding of your body" (straight from the front of the box) get things so — presumably — wrong? The answer after the Continue jump.

After you stand on the scale and hold the wired handgrip in front of you, the body composition monitor (Model HBF-516) purports to read a lot of stuff in just a few seconds: your weight, body fat, BMI, visceral fat, skeletal muscle, resting metabolism, and physical age. Physical age is actually derived from the other measurements; it's calculated based on weight, body fat, and skeletal muscle. I was well within the "normal" parameters for weight and muscle, but not body fat. That one was, um, a little high. It seems my love of love juicy steaks and pancakes dripping with syrup may be catching up with me.

That still doesn't explain why this machine thinks my body's age is more than two decades away from my real one. I exercise regularly. I drink lots of water. I get a decent amount of sleep. Why should a little extra fat throw things off so much?

The answer is simple: the Full Body Sensor, which sells for about $120, wasn't designed for athletes. Omron made the product with the "general consumer" in mind, so a person in extremely good shape (with, say, unusually high muscle mass) could skew the numbers. The company says it's developing a device with an "athlete mode," which should come out in late 2009.

I like that explanation, because I don't like the other one: that my body really does have a physical age of 57, and that I desperately need to change my diet or I might suffer from a coronary in a few years. A scary thought, and one I would never have been thinking before stepping on this thing. Athletes should probably skip the Omron Full Body Sensor until the planned upgrade comes out… unless you're a fan of freaking yourself out.

 
Send-A-Friend
(5) Comments

badmofaux:
Hey! I'm 34 too! And, I have that exact same scale... Only my scale says I have the body of a 27 year old. Did...More »


Comments

By PH0ENIX at 1:24 PM ON 11/25/08

You're just old. Get over it man. :-p

By Luis Arana at 5:11 PM ON 11/25/08

Maybe they should change the name to Moron body sensor?

By Ed W at 5:55 PM ON 11/25/08

The BMI charts say that I'm borderline obese, yet my fancy electronic scales says my body fat percentage is only slightly higher than average. Likewise for a weight lifter I know. The charts put him in the obese range and he's in better shape than me. So while these devices are useful, they're primarily useful in a comparative sense when we use them to track changes.

By T at 4:33 AM ON 12/05/08

Measuring body fat via bioelectrical impedence such as the hand held measures is notoriously inaccurate, the reading varies depending on how hydrated you are.
Also, just because you ran a marathon doesn't mean your body is in good shape. Distance athletes tend to suffer more long term injuries than any others due to the constant impact of their feet against the ground.
BMI is a bad measure because of people with more muscle mass, atheletes are a prime example of this.
You having a body age of 57 may not be that far off the mark, stop trying to justify the errors in the machine and look at changing your lifestyle.

By badmofaux at 6:13 PM ON 07/17/09

Hey!

I'm 34 too! And, I have that exact same scale...

Only my scale says I have the body of a 27 year old.


Did you say mean things to it?


Leave a Comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

(Please be patient, it may take a moment for your comment to appear.)

DVICE continues below
Get the latest tech news
on your cellphone!
Text DVICE to 72434
DVICE on your iPhone
Follow DVICE on Twitter
Editor: Peter Pachal
editor@dvice.com
©2009, Syfy. All rights reserved.