


Panasonic rolled out the DMC-LX3, a new flagship for its point-and-shoot line of Lumix cameras today, and this is not just like all the others. Finally, somebody breaks this stupid vicious circle of the megapixel wars. If you haven’t heard by now, more megapixels doesn’t necessarily mean better pictures. This nicely designed pocketcam stops at 10.1 megapixels, and instead concentrates on a bigger 1/1.63-inch sensor, facilitating better low-light shooting. How much better? Panasonic says the camera's sensitivity is 40% better than that of its predecessor.
While its execution might not be quite as impressive as its specs, this camera can shoot at a native ISO 3200. That means there are a lot of situations where you’ll be able to use natural, soft and flattering light instead of that harsh pop-up flash. Is this a big deal? Yes. This capability is important enough for me to have spent $1700 on a Nikon D300, one of the best cameras for low-light shooting.
Preliminary shots show the resolution of this $499 camera leaving something to be desired, but maybe the DMC-LX3’s mere existence will break this crazy spiraling of megapixels, which above about 8 just means more cumbersome files and not necessarily higher resolution. It’s about time point-and-shoot camera makers paid attention to features that really matter, rather than just megapixel numbers.
![]() | ![]() |
|
|
By CJW at 1:57 PM ON 07/22/08
It reminds me a lot of the Sigma DP1, but with a smaller sensor and fewer megapixels. ISO isn't everything, but combined with an f/2 lens, it makes for a pretty kick ass low-light camera.
What I like about it is that there's a hot shoe, so I can actually control lighting and the video mode captures at 1280x720 24fps. 30 frames would have been nicer, but 24 will do fine.
I hope Nikon brings out a similarly equipped and priced camera with compatibility with their CLS wireless flash system in the next year.
By Travis Hawkins at 4:05 PM ON 07/22/08
Has nobody commented on the model names similarity to "lum·mox -- A clumsy or stupid person".
Not sure who the joke is on but it's a little disturbing.
By Wolfie at 10:26 PM ON 07/23/08
I'd have thought the fact that the lens is an ultrawide 24mm equivalent with a fast f2 aperture was more notable than the inflated 1600 or 3200 ISO claims which everyone knows will be all but unusable. This is a definite challenger to the Canon G9 as the preferred DSLR companion compact.
By Cengoo at 5:45 AM ON 07/24/08
This Panasonic camera looks very nice.
By kingkong at 10:10 PM ON 07/24/08
I've had two FZ Lumixes in the past and currently use the FZ30. The results are better than Nikons in the same price range. Only my wife's Canon G9 gets better results. I would buy another Lumix any time.
kingkong:
I've had two FZ Lumixes in the past and currently use the FZ30. The results are better than Nikons in the same pric...More »