


On Sunday, the war between the new high-definition-disc formats officially began. Sure, HD DVD has been available since May, but as of June 25th, Samsung's BD-P1000 Blu-ray player is now available in stores for anyone who wants to buy it. With the opening battles of this format war now raging, we invite the generals behind the two factions to take a look back at previous conflicts before planning their next attacks.
While most of the people on the planet are familiar with the major types of media used throughout the world like CD, DVD, and even their predecessors, the audio cassette tape (formally called the Compact Cassette) and VHS, the route to a successful format is littered with the remains of long-forgotten attempts that had a lot of promise, but failed to capture the public's imagination. How many people have even heard of Elcaset, DCC, or SelectaVision, never mind having seen or used them? Yet these formats along with many others were foisted onto the market with plenty of fanfare by major electronics companies, only to flounder and eventually fail. There are specific reasons why they failed, and the backers of HD DVD and Blu-ray Disc would do well to heed them if they want to avoid creating yet another white-elephant format. What follows are some of the most important lessons to be learned from the Ghosts of Formats Past.
1) Extreme copy protection Some other copy-protection schemes like Sony's XCP — which was put on some CDs last year and would install hidden rootkit software on any PC that tried to play them — and certain types of watermarking can cause troublesome playback on some equipment, while others result in discs that might not play at all in certain drives and may even cause them to lock up and fail. Not exactly a good way to win over customers.
For every type of data protection designed to foil the guy who wants to make a copy of his Legally Blonde disc to play in the summer house, there are thousands of teenage hackers figuring out a way to bust the code, and history has shown us that the hackers win most of the time. U.S. copyright law allows someone to make a copy of a protected work for their personal use, and if the developers of HD DVD and Blu-ray could find a copy-protection system that allows for personal one-off copies while preventing mass duplication by pirates, many of the code hackers would find other ways to kill time.
2) Fight your format battles While neither VHS or Betamax could really be considered a failure despite the eventual triumph of VHS (each format was dominant for a time, and both sold millions of recorders), some public format wars result in the premature death of both competitors. Back in the pre-iPod days of the early '90s, Sony and Philips waged an intense battle for the portable digital audio player market, introducing MiniDisc and Digital Compact Cassette (DCC) respectively. While DCC flopped almost from the start, MiniDisc never really caught the public's imagination in a major way either, although it remains as a fringe format today. Had there been just one choice, there's a good chance it would have been a success.
Another potential pitfall of a format war is the temptation to beat the other guy to the punch by bringing a product that hasn't yet been fully developed to market. We're already seeing this in the latest battle, with some of the first HD DVD players unable to output a 1080p signal, while at least one Blu-ray Disc player (Pioneer's BDP-HD1) can't play regular audio CDs. The format that eventually comes out on top will likely be the one that can deliver the full potential of HD discs: output video in 1080p format (to fit in with the new buzzword for TV manufacturers, "Full HD"), lets you record, and most importantly, has the support of the key movie studios. The studio issue is a key sticking point as GE-owned NBC Universal is currently firmly behind HD DVD (NBC Universal owns SCI FI and SCI FI Tech), while Sony Pictures — including MGM, Columbia TriStar, and United Artists — is naturally backing Blu-ray. While corporate alliances like these can be formidable, market forces are still stronger: in 1988, Sony saw the writing on the wall and started delivering VHS recorders.
3) Give people what they want.SACD has one advantage in that it can be made as a hybrid disc that looks and feels just like a regular CD to most buyers, yet still contains a hi-rez audio layer to satisfy the audiophile crowd. Had it been sold at regular CD prices and filed in the standard CD bins in record stores, the format might have succeeded. But in reality, with the exception of a popular series of Rolling Stones reissues, most SACD hybrid releases remain forgotten in the remote and lonely audiophile section, way in the back of most record stores. While no standard DVD player can access the high-def content of Blu-ray or HD DVD discs, both camps have shown hybrid discs that incorporate a standard-definition layer. It would be a good idea if both formats went with hybrids — no one wants to see the creation of a new "videophile" bin in a dark corner of every Blockbuster.
4) Will it play my old stuff?
5) Beware the ideas of Sony.Sony's eagerness to develop formats in-house is probably rooted in wanting to have a format as successful as the audio Compact Cassette, invented by Philips in the early '60s. Looking at all the formats that Sony has thrown into the marketplace, it's clear the company sees format licensing as an important potential profit center. It's interesting to note, however, that the most successful formats have been those that Sony developed in joint collaboration with other manufacturers. Blu-ray falls into this camp too, having been developed in collaboration with Samsung and Philips, so there are reasons to be optimistic.
Conclusion
By nico31 at 9:21 PM ON 06/27/06
Say Hello to the new Betamax ;)
By NikonUser at 6:36 AM ON 07/07/06
Michael,
What a terrific piece! Excellently written, informative, and very timely. About the best piece I've read on this site.
Like many I've been contemplating the move to HD DVD, having just purchased the new 42" Samsung plasma, 5th Generation, and moving to Comcast's HD cable box. But, as you indicate, its best to sit this out for a few months at least to see what develops.
I visited a Circuit City earlier in the week and happened across a blu-ray demonstration, a demo disk including clips from movies in blu-ray HD on a HD plasma screen. The detail was stunning, so the move to HD will happen, as you say. But for consumers making the wrong choice can be costly.
I do wish a winner would appear soon, I'm anxious to dive in ;-)
By phrelin at 3:20 PM ON 07/07/06
Since I experienced all this history I appreciate your inciteful thoughts, though it was a bit depressing. Is this really some kind of beneficial progress?
I'm the guy who bought my first PC in 1979 and my plasma TV was one of Panasonic's first decent HD ready 42" models. I easily spend $30,000 a year on techno-crap (most of which I'll have to struggle to dispose of in an environmentally safe way).
Maybe its just because I'm 61. I remember somewhere between ages 40 to 50 I realized my hearing was going. An mp3 sounds just fine for me today, although I can still appreciate the difference between digital and vinyl, just barely. Now my vision isn't what it used to be.
While I technically appreciate HD quality and surround sound, mostly I watch movies ("films" if you prefer) for mental stimulation and artistic performance. I'm sure I'll buy one of these HD players after the war is over, but I don't have a real need to see actors skin blemishes in greater detail. I am right now recording a movie to a DVD from a recording on my Dish Satellite receiver recorder. The sound will be limited to stereo and video will be meaningfully better than VHS.
Did I mention I have a great 8-track collection. My best friend has an outstanding collection of movies on Betamax. And my son has a fine collection of Laservision video disks. I wonder which one of us is going to buy the Betamax of HD disk players...?
By Jgilligan at 8:40 PM ON 12/28/06
A very good analysis and I liked the conclusions, but I think you missed one of the points of your own article in your comment about lack of 1080p for HD-DVD players. Are most people going to care about the difference between 1080i vs 1080p? I work in technical support for a satellite programming supplier, and the calls I've been taking about HD are from people who couldn't tell you what the 1080 stands for, much less the difference between progressive and interlaced. These are people who are buying HD because the prices on TV sets have reached the point where it's not a major financial commitment like purchasing a car to upgrade to HD, so they might as well do it when it's time to buy a new set . I think the lower cost of HD-DVD players (and possibly upgrade drives for Xbox 360 units) will be the major factor if HD-DVD is the winner of this format war.
By emptyhelmet at 1:13 PM ON 12/31/06
I can't believe you missed one very large point: game consoles. Sony's Playstation 3 will be many household's first Blu-ray player just as some XBox 360 owners will get the HD-DVD upgrade to make it their first HD-DVD player. A decade ago the X-Box and Playstation 2 were many households first DVD players and can be credited with giving many people a first taste of DVD movies. Sales of these 2 systems may turn out to be a more important part of early adoption that could make today's Betamax fail before selling tons of players.
By JohnAndrews at 12:10 PM ON 01/02/07
1080P on Blu-Ray is not really a selling point. It is something to wow the consumer and sell them on smoke and mirrors. The information (movie) is put on the disc at 1080 frames (1080P) BUT it is at 24 or 30 frames a second can't remember which. TV's that accept a 1080P Input, do so at 60 Frames a second. (which by the way, not all 1080P Tv's actually do! :another gripe)
So we have a conversion being done, some say two to get everything properly done, It is interlaced to get 60 frames and then de-interlaced again to get 1080P/60 to input to your set. I've seen both players and I can say the 1080P when enabled looks terrible, it definitely loses something in the transfer, It looks better at 1080i or 720P. The only possible plus to blu-ray is that they can store more information on the disc so maybe one day they will actually shoot and store info at 1080P/60 or TV's will follow suit and input 1080P/24-30? I believe the latter would be best as it has something to do with the universality (is that a word) of the 1080P/24 signal to be easily converted to any of the "Old HD" formats. 1080i 720P or the lowly 480P
By lalaplz at 11:52 AM ON 01/24/08
Beat the format war before it starts...get a dual player. Plays both HD and BluRay and all the old discs as well. I have one and it works like a dream.
And EMPTYHELMET is absolutely correct, the PS3 and Xbox 360 were in fact the majority of the markets first format war users. With the relative cost of the consoles, though, it's not smart to wear the systems down using them to play movies...at least to me. The Xbox is more forgiving because the HD drive is an add-on, but, the PS3 is built in. Playing games and watching will wear the drive down extremely fast.
lalaplz:
Beat the format war before it starts...get a dual player. Plays both HD and BluRay and all the old discs as well. ...More »